|
EU
Launch 5th Directive
|
|
|
Text of the 5th Directive June 2002
http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/finances/insur/com2002-244/com2002-244_en.pdf
Progress with the 5th Directive at Brussels
http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int/oeil/oeil_ViewDNL.ProcedureView?lang=2&procid=6178
EU Press release June 2002
Click here
to read
BBC News Story July 2002
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2036974.stm
5th Directive - proposes a central UK "accident
notification" body
|
|
Justification
The proposal will undoubtedly facilitate the settlement of
claims, for the benefit of policyholders and victims alike, and will help
insurance markets to function effectively. While the Central body will be
obliged to forward the accident report to the insurer "without delay", it would
be helpful, to improve the situation still further for policyholders and
victims, if there was a requirement that the reports should be filed with the
Central body also "without delay".
|
22/10/2003 - EP VOTE 1st READING
|
The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Willi ROTHLEY and made several amendments to the Commission's proposals. The report was adopted by 525 votes in favour, 9 against and 16 abstentions. In addition: - there are new definitions for 'vehicle' and 'trailer'; - five years after the expiry of the five-year transition period, the minimum levels of cover shall be revised upwards on the basis of a proposal from the Commission in the light of the experience gained from applying the amounts; - the statement relating to claims from insurers must cover all claims made under the contract, but insurers may limit the statement to the previous five years if the contractual relationship is longer; - a reasoned offer of compensation must be made which must include the cost of pursuing claims in cases where liability is not contested and damages have been quantified; - new provisions have been inserted relating to a central body which must be notified of all traffic-accident reports; - certain provisions must apply to trailers.
|
| Article 6a Central office
Member States shall take all appropriate measures to
authorise a body to be notified without delay, at the same time as the judicial
authorities, of all traffic-accident reports filed by police
services.
That body shall without delay forward a copy of the
document to each insurer or legal practitioner concerned by the accident. If a
vehicle is not insured, it shall forward the document without delay to the
Guarantee Fund or, if it is insured with a foreign insurer, to the national
Office.
| |
|
|
BBC News Story July 2002
An accident waiting to
happen
|
| (emailed from Insurance Times, 08/08/02) |
|
|
So the bane of the motorist's life, the cyclist, could have the right to claim for every
scratch and knock incurred when jumping a red light or leaping off a pavement.
Having been personally on the end of both injury and claim as cyclist and driver, it is obvious that the EU Fifth
Motor Directive is an accident waiting to happen.
Behind the handlebars,
motorists are inconsiderate nutters who take pleasure in reckless driving.
Behind the wheel, all cyclists are two-wheeled
pariahs who disregard the Highway Code and get what they deserve. Never the
twain shall meet.
Both are liable in most cases, but the RAC has a point.
Compulsory insurance for all accidents must impact on premiums. The paperwork
involved alone will choke the system and make things more dangerous - an extra
£50 is a conservative estimate.
The European Commission's website offers
handy tips to the most frequently asked questions on the motor directive.
According to the EC, in some member states no insurance cover is offered and
it's up to the courts to establish the driver's liability. In some other states,
it says, the cyclist and pedestrian are covered
in an accident "irrespective of whether the driver is at fault", but admits the
civil liability imbedded in the different states' legislation does vary.
This is a reference to France, Belgium, Scandinavia, the Netherlands and
Germany. The Commission wants this system introduced in the next two to three
years. Having monitored these countries, the EC concludes that there has "been
no significant impact on the cost of insurance".
But all these countries,
like the UK, are suffering crises of liability and capacity and this legislation
will act as an extension to a motorist's third party liability. Extra insurance
in other words - which costs money.
If every scrape with a cyclist results in a claim, what will be the impact on
motorists' no claims discounts.
With the insurance industry about to be
hit from the fall-out of the after-the-event legal disputes like Callery v Gray,
which has cost millions of pounds already, this legislation could cause gridlock
for the whole motor insurance market.
| |
|
Coming shortly
- MDS 5th Directive solutions
|
|
|
For Insurers, a major change will
be the need to provide up to 7 years claims experience
in a standard interchange format for their clients -
MDS will make this available to clients from its MIDAS
system - more details to follow..
|

Copyright (c) 2001-2002 Motor Data Solutions Ltd. All rights reserved. enquiries@motordatasolutions.co.uk
|